Coverage explorer
The same mapping, read in either direction: start from the assessment type you are setting and see what it can evidence, or start from a UDL 3.0 consideration and see which types ask about it. The view you pick stays your default.
Naturally evidences
The considerations UDL Lens asks about for a interactive oral (collaborative) — things this type can demonstrate by being what it is, done well.
Sustaining Effort & Persistence
Engagement- 8.3Foster collaboration, interdependence, and collective learning
Same guideline, not asked for this type: 8.1, 8.2, 8.4, 8.5
Language & Symbols
Representation- 2.4Address biases in the use of language and symbols
Same guideline, not asked for this type: 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.5
Interaction
Action & Expression- 4.1Vary and honor the methods for response, navigation, and movement
Same guideline, not asked for this type: 4.2
Needs deliberate design
Guidelines a interactive oral (collaborative) does not currently reach. Not failures — the places to design UDL in on purpose, or to cover with a different assessment in the unit.
Welcoming Interests & Identities
EngagementConsiderations 7.1 · 7.2 · 7.3 · 7.4
Emotional Capacity
EngagementConsiderations 9.1 · 9.2 · 9.3 · 9.4
Perception
RepresentationConsiderations 1.1 · 1.2 · 1.3
Building Knowledge
RepresentationConsiderations 3.1 · 3.2 · 3.3 · 3.4
Expression & Communication
Action & ExpressionConsiderations 5.1 · 5.2 · 5.3 · 5.4
Strategy Development
Action & ExpressionConsiderations 6.1 · 6.2 · 6.3 · 6.4 · 6.5
Consideration codes and titles are verbatim UDL Guidelines 3.0 (CAST, July 2024) and machine-checked against CAST's table. The type-to-consideration mapping is a draft under domain review — a gap can mean a real limit of the assessment type, or mapping work not yet done.